This reading is available in two formats: standard and Spanish. Please select the version you wish to read using the dropdown below.

What does it mean to be a member of a group? In groups we meet our most basic needs; in groups we learn a language and a culture or way of life. In groups we also satisfy our yearning to belong, receive comfort in times of trouble, and find companions who share our dreams, values, and beliefs. Groups also provide security and protection from those who might wish to do us harm. Therefore, how a group defines its membership matters. Belonging can have significant advantages; being excluded can leave a person vulnerable.

How the members of a group, a nation, or a community define who belongs and who does not has a lot to do with how they define their universe of obligation. Sociologist Helen Fein coined this phrase to describe the group of individuals within a society “toward whom obligations are owed, to whom rules apply, and whose injuries call for amends.”1 In other words, a society’s universe of obligation includes those people who that society believes deserve respect and whose rights it believes are worthy of protection.

A society’s universe of obligation can change. Individuals and groups that are respected and protected members of a society at one time may find themselves outside of the universe of obligation when circumstances are different—such as during a war or economic depression. Beliefs and attitudes that are widely shared among members of a society may also affect the way that society defines its universe of obligation. For instance, throughout history, beliefs and attitudes about religion, gender, and race have helped to determine which people a society protects and which people it does not.

Although Fein uses the term to describe the way nations determine membership, we might also refer to an individual’s universe of obligation to describe the circle of other individuals that person feels a responsibility to care for and protect. Rabbi Jonathan Sacks describes how individuals often define those for whom they feel responsible: “[Eighteenth-century philosopher] David Hume noted that our sense of empathy diminishes as we move outward from the members of our family to our neighbors, our society, and the world. Traditionally, our sense of involvement with the fate of others has been in inverse proportion to the distance separating us and them.”2

Scholar and social activist Chuck Collins defines his universe of obligation differently from the example Sacks offers. In the 1980s, Collins gave the half-million dollars that he inherited from his family to charity. Collins told journalist Ian Parker:

Of course, we have to respond to our immediate family, but, once they're O.K., we need to expand the circle. A larger sense of family is a radical idea, but we get into trouble as a society when we don’t see that we’re in the same boat.3

Citations

  • 1 : Helen Fein, Accounting for Genocide (New York: Free Press, 1979), 4.
  • 2 : Jonathan Sacks, The Dignity of Difference: How to Avoid the Clash of Civilizations (London: Continuum, 2002), 30.
  • 3 : Ian Parker, “The Gift,” New Yorker, August 2, 2004, 60.

    Universo de Obligaciones

    ¿Qué significa ser miembro de un grupo? En grupo, satisfacemos nuestras necesidades más básicas, aprendemos un idioma y una cultura o forma de vida. En grupo, también satisfacemos nuestro anhelo de pertenecer, recibir consuelo en momentos difíciles y encontrar compañeros que compartan nuestros sueños, valores y creencias. Los grupos también brindan seguridad y protección contra aquellos que podrían querer hacernos daño. Por lo tanto, la manera en que un grupo define su pertenencia es importante. La pertenencia puede tener ventajas significativas; excluir a una persona puede dejarla vulnerable.

    La manera en que los miembros definen quién pertenece y quién no pertenece a un grupo, nación o comunidad tiene mucho que ver con la forma como definen su universo de obligaciones. La socióloga Helen Fein acuñó esta frase para describir al grupo de individuos dentro de una sociedad “con quienes tenemos obligaciones, a quienes se aplican las reglas y cuyas ofensas exigen ser reparadas.”1 Es decir, el universo de obligaciones de una sociedad incluye a aquellas personas que la sociedad cree que merecen respeto y cuyos derechos considera dignos de ser protegidos.

    El universo de obligaciones de una sociedad puede cambiar. Las personas y los grupos que son miembros respetados y protegidos de una sociedad pueden, en un momento dado, encontrarse fuera del universo de obligaciones cuando las circunstancias son diferentes; por ejemplo, durante una guerra o una depresión. Las creencias y las actitudes que son ampliamente compartidas entre los miembros de una sociedad también pueden afectar la manera en que esta define su universo de obligaciones. Por ejemplo, a lo largo de la historia, las creencias y las actitudes sobre religión, género y raza han permitido determinar qué personas protege una sociedad y cuáles no.

    A pesar de que Fein usa el término para describir la forma en que las naciones determinan la pertenencia, también podríamos referirnos al universo de obligaciones de una persona para describir el círculo de otros individuos que dicha persona siente la obligación de cuidar y proteger. El rabino Jonathan Sacks describe cómo definen las personas a aquellos por quienes se sienten responsables: “[El filósofo del siglo XVIII] David Hume notó que nuestra empatía disminuía a medida que nos íbamos alejando de los miembros de nuestra familia y acercando a nuestros vecinos, nuestra sociedad y el mundo. Tradicionalmente, nuestro sentido de involucramiento en el destino de otros ha sido inversamente proporcional a la distancia que nos separa.”2

    El académico y activista social Chuck Collins define su universo de obligaciones de manera diferente del ejemplo que ofrece Sacks. En la década de los ochenta, Collins donó a obras de caridad el medio millón de dólares que heredó de su familia. Collins le dijo al periodista Ian Parker:

    Claro que tenemos que responder por nuestra familia inmediata, pero, una vez estén bien, debemos ampliar el círculo. Un espíritu de familia más grande es una idea radical, pero nos metemos en problemas como sociedad cuando no vemos que estamos en el mismo barco.3

    Citations

    • 1 : Helen Fein, Accounting for Genocide (Nueva York: Free Press, 1979), 4.
    • 2 : Jonathan Sacks, The Dignity of Difference: How to Avoid the Clash of Civilizations (Londres: Continuum, 2002), 30.
    • 3 : Ian Parker, “The Gift”, New Yorker, 2 de agosto de 2004, 60.

    Connection Questions

    1. What factors influence the way a society defines its universe of obligation? In what ways might a nation or community signal who is part of its universe of obligation and who is not?
    2. What do you think might be some of the consequences for those who are not within a society’s universe of obligation?
    3. What factors influence how an individual defines his or her universe of obligation? In what ways might an individual show others who is part of his or her universe of obligation and who is not?
    4. In the 1800s, sociologist William Graham Sumner wrote, “Every man and woman in society has one big duty. That is, to take care of his or her own self.” Do you agree with Sumner? Why or why not? Is it wrong to prioritize caring for those closest to you over others? How does Sumner’s suggestion about how we define our universe of obligation differ from Chuck Collins’s view?
    5. How would you describe your nation’s universe of obligation? Your school’s? Your own?

    Related Content

    Reading

    Finding One's Voice

    Julius Lester describes finding his identity in an unexpected place as an African American teenager living in the segregated South (Spanish available).

    Lesson
    Holocaust

    Understanding Universe of Obligation

    Students are introduced to the concept of "universe of obligation" and prompted to illustrate circle of individuals who they feel a responsibility to care for and protect.

    Reading
    Holocaust

    Bystanders at Hartheim Castle

    Consider why the residents of Hartheim kept silent about the evidence of mass murder they witnessed in their town throughout World War II (Spanish available).

    Reading
    Holocaust

    Letter to Students

    Read aloud this letter with your class before you embark on the unit Teaching Holocaust and Human Behavior (Spanish available).

    Search Our Collection

    Everything you need to get started teaching your students about racism, antisemitism and prejudice.