ICC issues arrest warrant for Sudan’s president

March 5, 2009

On March 4, 2009, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued a warrant for the arrest of Sudan's president, Omar Al Bashir. (Click here to read the ICC's press release.) In a short video, Ken Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, asserts that this step shows the world that nobody, not even a head-of-state, is above the law when it comes to crimes against humanity.

On March 4, 2009, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued a warrant for the arrest of Sudan's president, Omar Al Bashir. (Click here to read the ICC's press release.) In a short video, Ken Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, asserts that this step shows the world that nobody, not even a head-of-state, is above the law when it comes to crimes against humanity. Human Rights Watch has also compiled an accessible and informative page, "Q & A: International Criminal Court's decision on Al-Bashir's Arrest Warrant" that explains the ICC's decision within the larger context of international law. In an interview with NPR, Prosecutor for the ICC, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, explains the courts decision to issue a warrant, "World Court Issues Warrant For Sudan's President."  The BBC News has posted a video of Bashir vowing to defy the ICC.  Two New York Times editorials provide different perspectives on the ICC's decision to issue an arrest warrant. While Archbishop Desmond Tutu argues that it is important for African nations to stand on the side of justice by arresting Bashir, humanitarian Franklin Graham believes that Bashir's arrest will only lead to greater instability in the region. 

Discussion Questions: 

 

  • What do you think is the best way to prevent genocide?  What is the role of the courts? 
  • What are some reasons in support of the arrest of President Bashir? What are some reasons against the arrest of President Bashir? How do you explain the different perspectives?
  •  The judges charged Bashir with crimes against humanity but not genocide?  Does this matter?  To whom? How does Ocampo explain the charges? 
  • What message does this arrest warrant send to Bashir, the people of Darfur, other government leaders, and citizens around the world?
  • If the Sudanese authorities and citizens do not hand their president over to the ICC, who is responsible for making sure that Bashir is arrested?  What are the implications if Bashir is never arrested and brought to trial?
  • How might history have been different if the ICC existed in 1940?
  • To what extent can laws and courts be a tool to stop and prevent crimes against humanity and genocide?
  • What else, besides laws and courts, can help stop and prevent crimes against humanity and genocide?
Related Facing Today Resources: